Dealing consistently with subrepositories
Matt Mackall
mpm at selenic.com
Wed Mar 30 09:16:02 CDT 2011
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 15:07 +0200, Martin Geisler wrote:
> It feels wrong to me that incoming supports recursion when pull does
> not. Perhaps pull should support --subrepos too and then just do what
> incoming does, namely do 'hg pull' in each subrepo.
This idea has already been ACKed.
> So if we put merge in the group with commit since I guess you could
> require people to merge from the bottom up, then this is the revised
> categories:
>
> * Must recurse: update <-> add <-> addremove <-> summary <->
> push <-> outgoing
>
> * Could recurse: pull <-> incoming and merge <-> commit <-> status <->
> diff
Merge and update are largely the same command.
> * Should not recurse: rollback?
Egads.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list