[PATCH] util: rename _windows_reserved_filenames and _windows_reserved_chars

[Adrian Buehlmann]

On 2011-05-08 08:57, Sune Foldager wrote:
> On 08-05-2011 00:29, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
>> On 2011-05-07 23:38, Sune Foldager wrote:
>>> On 2011-05-07 23:07, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
>>>> # HG changeset patch
>>>> # User Adrian Buehlmann<adrian at cadifra.com>
>>>> # Date 1304799920 -7200
>>>> # Node ID 4168febc29ffaee26de5cc1b1289454e4c85debf
>>>> # Parent  fe2153fd0fe5de49790e82d8038f5e07dd502e63
>>>> util: rename _windows_reserved_filenames and _windows_reserved_chars
>>>
>>> I realize we have this no-underscore policy, which I don't agree with, but is
>>> this really supposed to be an improvement?:
>>>
>>>> -_windows_reserved_filenames = '''con prn aux nul
>>>> +_winresnames = '''con prn aux nul
>>>
>>> Res? Resource names?... this is the primary reason I am opposed to
>>> no-underscores :p.
>>
>> Yeah. In *that* code, it is really hard see what _winresnames is
>> supposed to be hmm? You even had to delete the interesting bits, to
>> prove your point :-)
> 
> Well, I didn't claim to *prove* anything. I just don't like shortening 
> such names just so they can look less ridiculous when you remove the 
> underscores from them.
> 
>> Oh. Yeah. Let's see. And the function is called checkwinfilename. What
>> the heck is win again. Hmmm.
> 
> Well, I think 'win' is a bit more established and unambiguous than 'res'.
> 
>> I'm sure the next email is coming from Martin :-)
> 
> Oh come on now... et tu?

Instead of trolling and continuing to declare that you disagree, you
could propose a compromise or do something constructive.