[PATCH 0 of 5] remove

[Matt Mackall]

On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 21:33 +0200, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
> On 2011-05-23 21:26, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 21:07 +0200, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
> >> On 2011-05-23 20:25, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 16:56 +0200, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
> >>>> see patches
> >>>
> >>> I'm afraid I can't really see what's motivating this, can you elucidate
> >>> please?
> >>>
> >>
> >> If you don't want to look at the patches: No.
> > 
> > I did look, was confused, asked for clarification, and got rude
> > response. If you'd rather that I drop your patches than spend a couple
> > sentences explaining why we should want them, then I suppose that's your
> > choice. Moving on..
> > 
> 
> All I tried to say is, that you have to look at the individual patches.
> I don't think I was rude?

Is this a collection of unrelated patches? It appears not, but I can't
quite work out what the goal is. There's some stuff here that appears
iffy to me, knowing what the larger goal is will help me evaluate it.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.