[PATCH STABLE] largefiles: treat status of cache missed largefiles as "missing" correctly

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Thu Nov 10 14:38:20 CST 2011


On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 02:35 +0900, FUJIWARA Katsunori wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy at lares.dti.ne.jp>
> # Date 1320946381 -32400
> # Branch stable
> # Node ID b08bda4e36972a07ff888ba69394ea7fc454e4e7
> # Parent  54c0517c0fe8af4f8851a1bbb5bb229f0e7dd853
> largefiles: treat status of cache missed largefiles as "missing" correctly

This doesn't look completely insane, so I'll queue it. But I'd still
like the other largefiles experts to look it over.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.




More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list