[PATCH 2 of 4] clone to master bookmark if available

[Victor Suba]

>
> > Think about it, this is the recipe for forgetting to pull what you need
> and
> > not having it when you go offline.
>
> It is not the default workflow, but an option you *can* use. And you *have
> to*
> specify an option to get unsafe behaviour.


Sure.  I think we just need the default - safe workflow to cover shared
bookmark
use cases well.

So what you want seems to be to make pull do the following:
>
> $ hg in --bundle .hg/remotes/<repo>.bundle <repo>
> and
> $ hg in -B <repo> > .hg/remotes/<repo>.bookmarks
>
> Is it that?
>

I'm not sure.  Could you explain what it would do?  "hg in" shows you the
differences without integrating them right?'"

Actually I think "hg pull" should integrate the change sets and put the
remote bookmarks in a different namespace.

Cheers,
Vic


> Best wishes,
> Arne
> --
> Ein Mann wird auf der Straße mit einem Messer bedroht.
> Zwei Polizisten sind sofort da und halten ein Transparent davor.
>
>        "Illegale Szene. Niemand darf das sehen."
>
> Der Mann wird ausgeraubt, erstochen und verblutet,
> denn die Polizisten haben beide Hände voll zu tun.
>
> Willkommen in Deutschland. Zensur ist schön.
>      ( http://draketo.de/stichwort/zensur )
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20111111/12f3ddfa/attachment.html>