[PATCH 2 of 4] clone to master bookmark if available

[timeless]

Yes, that's a case where you'd use liquid. One of you will have a repo
which is mutable and supports liquid (possibly anne with you pushing).

On 11/11/11, Sean Farley <sean at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:35 AM, timeless <timeless at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please consider Phases instead of this complicated Behavior Change.
>>
>> Your argument seems to partially be of the form "I want to be able to
>> have wanton sex for the experiences and not risk infecting my spouse."
>>
>
> Well, what's wrong with being sexy?
>
>
>> Thankfully, in computing space this is possible. In Hg, you do this:
>>
>> hg clone http://spouse/repo workspace
>> # incoming is spouse
>> hg clone workspace playspace
>> # incoming is workspace
>> cd playspace
>> # play
>> hg pull http://random/space
>> hg pull http://another/space
>> hg pull -R ../workspace
>> # pull from spouse to workspace
>> hg pull
>> # transitive pull from spouse+workspace into playspace
>>
>> You don't arbitrarily hg push from playspace to workspace, that would
>> be reckless. And you certainly don't push from workspace to spouse
>> without reviewing, that would be grouns for divorce.
>>
>> Phases will give you some of the mutability you want. Things which
>> aren't for publishing won't be pushed to public servers.
>
>
> Phases seems interesting but still a little unclear if I want to share my
> playspace with, for example, Arne? The particular changesets in question
> break some functionality and I need his help to fix them. Is this what the
> liquid phase is for? To me, it would make a little more sense to have this
> on a bookmark, pushing two heads, but have mercurial not force the other
> developers to deal with them just yet (i.e. by default, don't show heads
> that are on bookmarks)
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device