subrepo grand plan

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Tue Oct 18 12:50:59 CDT 2011


On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 19:23 +0200, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> If the only reason it isn't changed is backward compatibility then why 
> not create a new subrepo2 implementation - for example as an extension - 
> and deprecate the old one?

Someone just kill me now, please.

I've explained in detail how to evolve our way out of the current
situation without breaking backwards-compatibility numerous times and
apparently no one is listening.

I think I might just start deleting all further mail on subrepos unread
until one shows up entitled:

[PATCH 1 of 4] add: support adding explicit files in subrepos

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.




More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list