subrepo grand plan

[Laurens Holst]

Op 20-10-2011 18:36, Dirkjan Ochtman schreef:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 17:18, Matt Mackall<mpm at selenic.com>  wrote:
>>> I'm with Patrick in that I prefer (b) even now. I find his argument
>>> about predictability and scalability of performance compelling, but
>>> mostly I find recursive commit (by default) plain scary.
>> Would it still be scary if you had recursive diff and status by default?
> Much less so, of course. Does rebase also recurse by default? log?
> parents? It still seems to me that the conceptual integrity would
> suffer, and it would take a whole lot of time and changesets to get
> everything integrated properly with the principle of least
> astonishment intact.

Does .hgignore recurse?

~Laurens

-- 
~~ Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~
Laurens Holst, developer, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Website: www.grauw.nl. Working @ www.roughcookie.com


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4332 bytes
Desc: S/MIME cryptografische ondertekening
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20111020/c9e8d2a5/attachment.bin>