Obsolete Development

Sean Farley sean.michael.farley at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 18:40:02 CDT 2012


Hi all,

I've just spent the day learning and playing around with Pierre-Yves's
obsolete and evolve extensions with the newest mercurial and they are
_really_ cool! I just had a few questions about its development.

1) For the logilab webpages / docs, how would the group like patches,
i.e. pull-requests, mailing-list, or something else?

2) For the terminology, it seems some keywords have been decided upon,
and some have not ("I’m not very happy with this naming scheme and I’m
looking for a better distinction between direct successors and **any
successors*." from
http://hg-lab.logilab.org/doc/mutable-history/html/obs-terms.html).
I'm more interested in discussing the command names, such as, `gup`,
`gdown`, etc. Where should that happen?

3) Similar to (1), where should patches for code (not docs) go? Same
place as (1)?

4) Are there any particular features that experimental users should be testing?

Thanks!


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list