[PATCH 04 of 10 V2] branchmap: takes filtered revision in account for cache calculation

[Pierre-Yves David]

On 1 janv. 2013, at 00:41, Augie Fackler wrote:

> 
> On Dec 28, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Dave S <snidely.too at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Pierre-Yves David
>> <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 26 déc. 2012, at 23:25, Dave S wrote:
>> 
>>>> "build a cache [...] and then return the hash of the cache to use when ..."
>>>> 
>>>> My current thinking, such as it is, is that being explicit about the
>>>> relationship of the hash to the cache is valuable.
>>> 
>>> You got me totally confused here :-(
>>> 
>>> Whats wrong? what do you suggest as an alternative ?
>> 
>> That was my alternative, but I'm satisfied with your taking Kevin's
>> suggestion.
>> 
>> There is still a small concern about "distinct", as I previously
>> mentioned.  Do you mean "distinguish" (verb) or "distinct signature"
>> (noun) ?
> 
> I'm going to stop reviewing this series here, since my MUA is totally failing to thread this and I can't find the conversation with Kevin. Pierre-Yves, can you resend patches 4:tip of this series when you're ready for re-review?

V2 is the resend ready for re-review. Dave S feedback have been resolved as far I understand it.

Thanks for looking at it. This series if on the critical path for filtering

-- 
Pierre-Yves