[PATCH] annotate: added --message/-m option to list the commit message (issue3117)
mpm at selenic.com
Tue Feb 14 12:36:23 CST 2012
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 11:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:58:15AM +0100, Jesús Espino wrote:
> > 2012/2/14 Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at logilab.fr>:
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:49:33PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 16:59 +0100, Jesús Espino wrote:
> > >> > # HG changeset patch
> > >> > # User Jesus Espino Garcia <jesus.espino at kaleidos.net>
> > >> > # Date 1329062320 -3600
> > >> > # Node ID c86ea5f3221f2c1d3313b7013a6e41d0254e492c
> > >> > # Parent cb756482c1aad808add481a6967e2eb7a5aead21
> > >> > annotate: added --message/-m option to list the commit message (issue3117)
> > >>
> > >> Seems like it will be disastrously ugly with all but the shortest commit
> > >> messages?
> > >
> > > Adding a generic --template argument will allow people do to any kind of
> > > crazyness without adding to much option to annotate.
> > This is another interesting approach, i will try to implement it, but
> > anyway i think the -m option is enough common to include it in the
> > annotate command directly.
> I'm not convinced this is a common requirement (on the command line). What do
> other people think about this ?
I've heard it exactly once. I don't think this feature meets the utility
threshold. Once we have generic templating, this feature will be more
readily available without adding extra interface cruft.
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial-devel