[PATCH 09 of 19 STABLE] largefiles: use dirstate instead of lfdirstate for resource efficiency

[Greg Ward]

On 27 February 2012, FUJIWARA Katsunori said:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy at lares.dti.ne.jp>
> # Date 1330335216 -32400
> # Branch stable
> # Node ID d9217e9e3d58f84a077305fff6468d47d284ca03
> # Parent  2456abdf233742c14519360bb30786f0741291d3
> largefiles: use dirstate instead of lfdirstate for resource efficiency

What, everywhere? No... from comparing the patch and the code, I see
that you're only doing this for the 'status' command. But the commit
message didn't say so. It should. You nearly gave me a heart attack,
proposing to do this on stable. ;-)

What's the performance benefit of this? I.e. is there a serious
performance bug that needs to be fixed on stable? Or is this just a
nice little tweak?

        Greg
-- 
Greg Ward                                http://www.gerg.ca/
There are no stupid questions -- only stupid people.