Having more than three phases

[Martin Geisler]

Jason Harris <jason at jasonfharris.com> writes:

> So again I think the name "secret" is then bad. Laurens has taken the
> command at it's face value, (as I would) and then is rightly
> complaining that something secret is not actually "secret". Better
> names might be:
>
> private / draft / public
>
> private / draft / complete
>
> unshared / draft / complete
>
> etc. But unless secret is actually, well secret, then it's likely not
> such a good name.

I also don't like 'secret' very much.

At the Zurich sprint we discussed:

* personal: implies mostly private and non-shared to me, like a personal
  diary.

* grounded: like planes that are not allowed to take off. The emphasis
  is on the non-shared nature of these changesets, but it does not
  promise privacy.

-- 
Martin Geisler

Mercurial links: http://mercurial.ch/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20120109/f2117455/attachment.pgp>