[PATCH 0 of 9 phases] revset, phase command and push//pull fixes

[Laurens Holst]

Op 08-01-12 16:30, Pierre-Yves David schreef:
>      But needed for [6] (phase commandal
> [6] Implemented phase command:
>
>      The controvertial part abouly of issue than [3] but use phase commands and phase names [4:6]
>
> Why do we need to exchange phase
> ==========================oc====
>
> If a changeset are locally draft but remotely secret it ite set are used to computed remote phases from remote phase roots.
>
> When a secret changeset only have public parents it onlyen====================
>
> If a changeset are locally draft but remotely secret itug
>
> Why do we need to exchange phase
> ==========================oc====
>
> If a changeset are locally draft but remotely

Description got mangled?

(It also appears like this in the archives, so it’s not my mail client.)

~Laurens