[PATCH 0 of 9 phases] revset, phase command and push//pull fixes

[Laurens Holst]

Op 9-1-2012 17:47, Christian Ebert schreef:
> * Laurens Holst on Monday, January 09, 2012 at 13:07:19 +0100
>> Op 08-01-12 16:30, Pierre-Yves David schreef:
>>>     But needed for [6] (phase commandal
>>> [6] Implemented phase command:
>>>
>>>     The controvertial part abouly of issue than [3] but use phase commands and phase names [4:6]
>>>
>>> Why do we need to exchange phase
>>> ==========================oc====
>>>
>>> If a changeset are locally draft but remotely secret it ite set are used to computed remote phases from remote phase roots.
>>>
>>> When a secret changeset only have public parents it onlyen====================
>>>
>>> If a changeset are locally draft but remotely secret itug
>>>
>>> Why do we need to exchange phase
>>> ==========================oc====
>>>
>>> If a changeset are locally draft but remotely
>> Description got mangled?
>>
>> (It also appears like this in the archives, so it’s not my mail client.)
> Not in Mutt - very long lines, but no mangling.

Hm, odd. Maybe patchbomb exceeds some max line length?

http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2012-January/036907.html

~Laurens

-- 
~~ Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~
Laurens Holst, developer, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Website: www.grauw.nl. Working @ www.roughcookie.com


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4332 bytes
Desc: S/MIME cryptografische ondertekening
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20120109/157a296c/attachment.bin>