[PATCH 0 of 9 phases] revset, phase command and push//pull fixes

[Christian Ebert]

* Laurens Holst on Monday, January 09, 2012 at 19:35:39 +0100
> Op 9-1-2012 17:47, Christian Ebert schreef:
>> * Laurens Holst on Monday, January 09, 2012 at 13:07:19 +0100
>>> Op 08-01-12 16:30, Pierre-Yves David schreef:
>>>>   But needed for [6] (phase commandal
>>>> [6] Implemented phase command:
>>>> 
>>>>   The controvertial part abouly of issue than [3] but use phase commands and phase names [4:6]
>>>> 
>>>> Why do we need to exchange phase
>>>> ==========================oc====
>>>> 
>>>> If a changeset are locally draft but remotely secret it ite set are used to computed remote phases from remote phase roots.
>>>> 
>>>> When a secret changeset only have public parents it onlyen====================
>>>> 
>>>> If a changeset are locally draft but remotely secret itug
>>>> 
>>>> Why do we need to exchange phase
>>>> ==========================oc====
>>>> 
>>>> If a changeset are locally draft but remotely
>>> Description got mangled?
>>> 
>>> (It also appears like this in the archives, so it’s not my mail client.)
>> Not in Mutt - very long lines, but no mangling.

oops, no, I was not concentrating, sorry, same garbling here,
sorry about that.
 
> Hm, odd. Maybe patchbomb exceeds some max line length?
> 
> http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2012-January/036907.html

I don't think so:
http://selenic.com/hg/rev/a82b6038ff08

c
-- 
theatre - books - texts - movies
Black Trash Productions at home: http://www.blacktrash.org
Black Trash Productions on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/blacktrashproductions