[PATCH 0 of 1] hidden support for graphlog

[Pierre-Yves David]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 10 janv. 2012, at 01:35, Matt Mackall wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:33 +0100, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>> I know there is some plan to merge graphlog and log, but as it's not going to
>> happen for 2.1 here is asmall patch to make graphlog hidden aware.
> 
> I don't get it. It's impossible to have hidden cset in 2.1, right? Why
> is this interesting now and why would it be relevant to stable?

Of course it's possible! Since 1.9 we have this hidden revset. log complies with it, hgview (qt viewer from logilab) comply with it.

There is no user either in core or  in bundled extension, but I do have an extension that use it for several month and it works like a charm.

We do have this concept in core and this patch is improving his implementation.

You can even expect a patch to ease adding logic to fill it in coming days.

I do not get what you mean by this question about stable.

- -- 
Pierre-Yves David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=x+0O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----