[PATCH] largefiles: remove invalid comment (issue3065)

Martin Geisler mg at lazybytes.net
Wed Jan 11 02:10:41 CST 2012


Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> writes:

> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:17 +0100, Martin Geisler wrote:
>> Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 15:11 +0100, Martin Geisler wrote:
>> >> Na'Tosha Bard <natosha at unity3d.com> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > # HG changeset patch
>> >> > # User Na'Tosha Bard <natosha at unity3d.com>
>> >> > # Date 1325975839 -3600
>> >> > # Node ID 47cf8d900869c2a5673a8e32a01531b70b9e395f
>> >> > # Parent  f15c646bffc7187c357f3dcc12761513c1ed6609
>> >> > largefiles: remove invalid comment (issue3065)
>> >> 
>> >> Thanks, I've pushed your last three patches to largefiles:
>> >> 
>> >> changeset:   15785:acb0a40fa14d
>> >> user:        Na'Tosha Bard <natosha at unity3d.com>
>> >> date:        Sat Jan 07 23:37:19 2012 +0100
>> >> summary:     largefiles: remove invalid comment (issue3065)
>> >> 
>> >> changeset:   15786:aca0f2b3c7e3
>> >> branch:      stable
>> >> parent:      15779:01831f55e972
>> >> user:        Na'Tosha Bard <natosha at unity3d.com>
>> >> date:        Sun Jan 08 11:19:51 2012 +0100
>> >> summary:     largefiles: fix confusion upon removal of added largefile (issue3176)
>> >> 
>> >> changeset:   15787:0c7b83a057aa
>> >> branch:      stable
>> >> user:        Na'Tosha Bard <natosha at unity3d.com>
>> >> date:        Sun Jan 08 12:35:47 2012 +0100
>> >> summary:     largefiles: fix output of hg summary (issue3060)
>> >
>> > ..which means I've just wasted the past half hour duplicating a bunch
>> > of your work. Please reply to either each patch or at least the thread
>> > they're in so that I don't have to read everything in my inbox once
>> > before beginning work.
>> 
>> Sorry about that, I had hoped you would see the changesets when you pull
>> from crew.
>
> I usually start at the top of my inbox and work my way down. And I still
> want to be able to delete stuff from my inbox without having to do a
> cross-correlation or a test-apply. If I have 50 patches in my inbox and
> a dozen incoming csets that may or may not overlap, matching them up
> pair-wise gets tedious. It's a whole lot easier for me to simply read
> all the replies to a patch series before applying it - it's local
> information and I'm going to do that anyway.

Yeah, I agree that it's better to reply on each patch. I guess I'm just
out of practise :-)

-- 
Martin Geisler

Mercurial links: http://mercurial.ch/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20120111/20dc39ff/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list