Call for discussion: Phase names

timeless timeless at gmail.com
Wed Jan 11 22:17:09 CST 2012


That'd be "malleable" fwiw

On 1/10/12, Levi Bard <taktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> However, by that logic, "public" could be improved to highlight the
>>> >> distinguishing property (immutability). Maybe permanent/draft/local?
>>> >
>>> > Continuing that logic, why not just call them "immutable" ?
>>>
>>> Someone said at the sprint that it's best if we can pick un-negated
>>> words.
>>
>> Because then we use "not <negated-form>" for negation.
>>
>> eg: not unshared.
>
> "Not immutable" actually makes sense (in English), though.
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list