Local vs Server (phase names and clones)
Pierre-Yves David
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Tue Jan 17 07:04:28 CST 2012
Quick answer:
* We don't have sensible way to know if a local repo is server or not.
* Secret changeset are not exchanged between repo (local or not).
* you can alway bundle secret changeset
* I'm considering a "--private" (or "--include-private") switch to commit to allow pushing secret changeset. (as --force did with mq)
* With the change in discovery code, there will probably be more extension aiming to prevent exchange some changeset with a finer grain than phase. Those extension will probably not use phase directly.
See the other thread for more details.
--
Pierre-Yves David
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list