Call for discussion: Phase names
Pierre-Yves David
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Tue Jan 17 13:11:58 CST 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 17 janv. 2012, at 19:24, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 09:58 +0100, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>> Matt Mackall notified on IRC that the content of this discussion convinced him to reconsider the rule "not have conflicting initials" and replace "secret" by "private".
>>
>> The current naming scheme is now:
>>
>> public / draft / private
>>
>> The according option will be
>>
>> * --public (no short option)
>> * -d --draft
>> * -p --private
>
> Please only have long options.
???
Since I've a phase enabled mercurial, I use "hg phase -fs" or "hg phase -d" on regular basis ?
What are your rational for removing short version ?
- --
Pierre-Yves David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org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=FFeQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list