Call for discussion: Phase names

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Tue Jan 17 17:55:00 CST 2012


On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 00:48 +0100, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> On 17 janv. 2012, at 20:46, Matt Mackall wrote:
> 
> > Long options are the price of using private instead of secret as the
> > phase name.
> 
> It's a pretty big price :-/
> 
> Should we consider moving away from public then ?

No, I haven't seen an alternative to public that I think is even
remotely usable.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.




More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list