Call for discussion: Phase names

Jeremiah Dodds jeremiah.dodds at gmail.com
Tue Jan 17 20:24:25 CST 2012


On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Pierre-Yves David
<pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>
> On 17 janv. 2012, at 20:46, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
>> Long options are the price of using private instead of secret as the
>> phase name.
>
> It's a pretty big price :-/

As someone not particularly invested in the issue, I'd say that the
lack of short options is easily handled by aliases, no?


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list