Some initial impressions of phases

[Pierre-Yves David]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 01:30:19PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 19:25 +0100, Jason Harris wrote:
> > So it seems like revert does report stuff.
> 
> It reports non-explicitly mentioned filenames, just like add, addremove,
> and commit -A.

One interresting point here is: "non-explicitly mentioned filenames".

The phase command will indeed move "non-explicitly mentioned revision" when
setting the target revision in the specified phases required to change phase of
unspecified ancestor (or descendant).



-- 
Pierre-Yves David

http://www.logilab.fr/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20120125/000a8557/attachment.pgp>