Some initial impressions of phases

Pierre-Yves David pierre-yves.david at logilab.fr
Wed Jan 25 08:34:28 CST 2012


On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:15PM +0700, Andrei Polushin wrote:
> 25.01.2012 16:14, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 04:50:56AM +0700, Andrei Polushin wrote:
> >> I wonder, could the phase concept be further developed following the idea
> >> previously described as "Hidden branches/heads"[2]?
> >> [...]
> >> I'm sorry if I miss any previous discussion on this.
> > 
> > There is plan in this direction detailled here:
> > 
> > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MutableHG
> 
> That's exactly I was asking for: the existence of common vision for both
> phases and hidden changesets.
> 
> At this early design time, is there a strong decision that hidden changesets
> couldn't be realized as changesets in a "hidden" phase?

yes:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.mercurial.devel/46878

-- 
Pierre-Yves David

http://www.logilab.fr/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20120125/b4b001c6/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list