[PATCH 0 of 8] Interraction between obsolete changesets and exchange operation

Idan Kamara idankk86 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 6 04:06:00 CDT 2012


On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Pierre-Yves David <
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>
> This series implement basic filtering of obsolete changeset during
> exchange
> operation.
>
> It's based on the "not that good" implementation of secret changeset
> filtering.
> The righ way to do that would be to implement changelog level filtering
> but we
> are too late in the release cycle for that. In the other hand such
> filtering is
> too much central to the obsolete concept to be delayed.

Is anything going to use obsolete before 2.4? If not, what's the rush
of adding these things the wrong way?

>
> This series make this filtering functionnal but are quite inefficient.
>
>
> --
> Pierre-Yves David
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20120706/f9d24b61/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list