[PATCH] revlog: ancestors() takes list of revs rather than a *revs

Joshua Redstone joshua.redstone at fb.com
Fri Jun 1 14:30:21 CDT 2012


I did an interdiff of our diffs, and to be clear, the only difference is that you also modified descendants.  Phew!  Thought  I was loosing my mind.
Josh

From: Bryan O'Sullivan <bos at serpentine.com<mailto:bos at serpentine.com>>
Date: Friday, June 1, 2012 2:52 PM
To: Joshua Redstone <joshua.redstone at fb.com<mailto:joshua.redstone at fb.com>>
Cc: "mercurial-devel at selenic.com<mailto:mercurial-devel at selenic.com>" <mercurial-devel at selenic.com<mailto:mercurial-devel at selenic.com>>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] revlog: ancestors() takes list of revs rather than a *revs

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Joshua Redstone <joshua.redstone at fb.com<mailto:joshua.redstone at fb.com>> wrote:
revlog: ancestors() takes list of revs rather than a *revs

Turns out that you and I wrote essentially the same patch today, but yours only catches 14 out of the 23 hunks that need to be changed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20120601/c32f6204/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list