[PATCH 6 of 8] obsolete: exchange obsolete marker over pushkey

[Pierre-Yves David]

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:31:36AM -0500, Augie Fackler wrote:
> 
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Patrick Mézard wrote:
> 
> > It grows indefinitely. This may not be as bad as it sounds in practice, there are two extreme cases:
> > - Public repositories. They should accept only "killing" markers.
> 
> Actually, I think for public review repositories there's a really compelling story around being able to exchange draft phase changes and evolve things. An evolution-aware code review system could be really amazing.


Yes this is why you can setup you repo as "not-publishing"

    [phases]
    publish=False

This allows you to keep pushed changeset draft.

This kind of repo was used by Patrick and I to work on this very series:

    http://hg-lab.logilab.org/

And most of Logilab review is now done this way.


-- 
Pierre-Yves David

http://www.logilab.fr/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20120608/7fcd493b/attachment.pgp>