Proposed bookmarks plan posted to wiki

[Kevin Bullock]

On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 10:49 -0400, Augie Fackler wrote:
>> On Jun 11, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 14:42 -0500, Kevin Bullock wrote:
>>>> This is a compromise between local-only bookmarks and topic-branch
>>>> bookmarks.
>>> 
>>> Not sure what the distinction you're drawing here is.
>> 
>> I think he means my 'queued' bookmark (which is just a pointer to
>> where I want to be applying patches from others vs bookmarks you would
>> share for feature work in a non-email-based workflow. Is that accurate
>> Kevin?
> 
> That sounds like it's simply a 'local vs shared' distinction rather than
> a 'topic-base vs non-topic-based[?]' distinction. If I even understand
> what a "topic" is, I can have local "topics" and shared "non-topics". An
> example shared non-topic would be "the last cset that successfully
> passed through CI".

Yes, that's all true. I was drawing the delineation using the two most commonly discussed workflows, but you're right—and all of that is important to keep in mind in developing the plan.

pacem in terris / мир / शान्ति / ‎‫سَلاَم‬ / 平和
Kevin R. Bullock

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20120613/1b01d050/attachment.html>