Proposed bookmarks plan posted to wiki

Kevin Bullock kbullock+mercurial at
Wed Jun 13 14:42:48 CDT 2012

On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 12:42 -0500, Kevin Bullock wrote:
>> On Jun 11, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 14:42 -0500, Kevin Bullock wrote:
>>>> * Warn (with hint) when pushing changesets that are bookmarked
>>>> without pushing the bookmarks (suggested by [[marmoute]]:
>>> I don't think a warning is sufficient. Given our non-existent
>>> support
>>> for unpushing, this warning will usually translate as "you idiot,
>>> you
>>> just pushed the code you were trying to keep local".
>>> Sometimes our "no new heads" restriction will prevent this class of
>>> accident, but I think we should aim to do it more generally.
>> If it's more than a warning, then I can't keep a local-only bookmark
>> on public changesets.
> Sure you can, they just can't be heads. If they're on heads, you'll need
> to bypass the check.

So you're suggesting that if my 'already-reviewed' bookmark is on a head, and I don't want to share that bookmark, I'll have to 'push --force'?

pacem in terris / мир / शान्ति / ‎‫سَلاَم‬ / 平和
Kevin R. Bullock

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list