RFC: Alternative for exemaker

[Adrian Buehlmann]

On 2012-06-28 19:32, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 18:48 +0200, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
>> On 2012-06-27 18:30, Matt Mackall wrote:
>>> Ok, tip now compiles cleanly with:
>>>
>>>  gcc -Ic:\python26\include -Lc:\python26\libs -Lpython26 hg.c -o hg.exe
>>>
>>> So I think this is now in a state where we should include it in our tree
>>> (and possibly in our build process).
>>
>> Into what directory should hg.c go?
> 
> I was thinking mercurial/hgexe.c is probably the right place for it. 

Sorry for bothering again (forgot to ask).

If I send a patch that adds said mercurial/hgexe.c, what copyright
header would you prefer?

Mads convinced me that GPL wasn't needed, so I picked the one I
currently have [1], but I guess the current license header might look a
bit odd if the file lives in the mercurial tree.

I don't have a strong opinion and am perfectly fine with using GPL V2+
(that is, Mercurial's) or the one I have now.

[1] https://bitbucket.org/abuehl/hgexe/src/125dc659dd56/hg.c#cl-1