[PATCH] transplant: permit merge changesets via --force/-f
Steven Stallion
sstallion at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 13:02:35 CDT 2012
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Steven Stallion <sstallion at gmail.com> wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Steven Stallion <sstallion at gmail.com>
> # Date 1332827534 25200
> # Node ID 4743d44e9353b643232846cfc12990bc64162573
> # Parent e53c0b2d7b6081586666579b4d0a2ffdedaac1b8
> transplant: permit merge changesets via --force/-f
>
> This change permits the transplant extension to operate on merge
> changesets by way of --force/-f. This is particularly useful for
> workflows which cherrypick branch merges rather than each commit
> within a branch.
>
> diff -r e53c0b2d7b60 -r 4743d44e9353 hgext/transplant.py
> --- a/hgext/transplant.py Mon Mar 26 16:42:53 2012 -0500
> +++ b/hgext/transplant.py Mon Mar 26 22:52:14 2012 -0700
> @@ -144,8 +144,8 @@
> if not hasnode(repo, node):
> repo.pull(source, heads=[node])
>
> - if parents[1] != revlog.nullid:
> - self.ui.note(_('skipping merge changeset %s:%s\n')
> + if parents[1] != revlog.nullid and not opts.get('force'):
> + self.ui.warn(_('skipping merge changeset %s:%s\n')
> % (rev, short(node)))
> patchfile = None
> else:
> @@ -466,6 +466,7 @@
> ('b', 'branch', [],
> _('pull patches from branch BRANCH'), _('BRANCH')),
> ('a', 'all', None, _('pull all changesets up to BRANCH')),
> + ('f', 'force', False, _('force transplant of merge changesets')),
> ('p', 'prune', [], _('skip over REV'), _('REV')),
> ('m', 'merge', [], _('merge at REV'), _('REV')),
> ('e', 'edit', False, _('invoke editor on commit messages')),
> @@ -499,7 +500,8 @@
> the branch holding the named revision, up to that revision. If
> --all/-a is specified, all changesets on the branch will be
> transplanted, otherwise you will be prompted to select the
> - changesets you want.
> + changesets you want. If --force/-f is specified, merge changesets
> + will not be skipped.
>
> :hg:`transplant --branch REVISION --all` will transplant the
> selected branch (up to the named revision) onto your current
Hey All,
Any movement on this? Should I consider Pierre-Yves comments a rejection?
Cheers,
Steve
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list