[PATCH 4 of 4] mq: introduce mq.check setting

[Didly]

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Faheem Mitha <faheem at email.unc.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 May 2012 16:48:54 +0200, Patrick Mézard <pmezard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> What other people think?
>>
>> Idan: --disjoint
>> Me: --keep-changes or --keep
>
> FWIW, I like --disjoint. It is a more precise description of what is
> happening. Also, there is an open bug about this, reported by me. I
> think Idan tried to fix this once, but it didn't make it.
>
> Alternatively, how about --local-changes?
>
>                                                     Regards, Faheem

Wouldn't it be even better to have --keep-local-changes, or its
shorter version, --keep? :-)

Angel