[PATCH 2 of 5 RFC] revset: add a predicate for finding transplants
Matt Mackall
mpm at selenic.com
Mon May 14 02:35:58 CDT 2012
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 01:30 -0400, Matt Harbison wrote:
> Questions:
> - Is not living in the extensions OK?
Yes.
> - Is the name distinct enough from transplant's 'transplanted()' form to be
> useful?
> - Since both predicates without a revision select the destination changesets,
> there's nothing to find all nodes that are transplant sources. Should I add
> one more predicate to select the source or all sources? I can't think of a
> good name. (I suppose this applies to all except convert).
??
> - Given that the goal is to find where a changeset is propagated, it didn't
> seem to make sense to support taking in a set. Or should it use
> revset.getset() anyway and make sure the size is 1 if a rev is provided?
> rev() and id() didn't take this route.
I can see use-cases for this, for instance:
grafted(branch(default)) # find anything that's a graft from default
..but I also think we want:
grafted()
But really, I think we want a single predicate that will identify any of
grafted/rebased/transplanted/converted. Perhaps:
origin([id|set])
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list