extending crew

Adrian Buehlmann adrian at cadifra.com
Fri Oct 5 16:20:05 CDT 2012


On 2012-10-05 21:30, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com
> <mailto:raf at durin42.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I'll endeavor to do more patch review, and if nothing else
>     draft-phase queue them on my server.
> 
> 
> One of the main reasons the crew repo existed back in the day was that
> it was a pain to set up publishing servers.
> 
> bitbucket now serves that function perfectly well, so that purpose for
> the crew repo is no longer as clear.

I was thinking about that as well. Bitbucket would make it easier for
Windows people, who aren't that fluent in pushing over ssh using a key.

But it doesn't look exactly like there would be tons of people having
that problem.

> If we had a few people publishing "patches I've reviewed and accepted"
> repos on bitbucket, it would work perfectly well provided the rest of
> folks knew where to look.

..which includes the buildbot, which nowadays knows about the crew repo

http://hgbuildbot.kublai.com/builders/Windows%202008%20R2%20hg%20tests/builds/238


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list