[PATCH 0 of 7 F2 series] fncache2 repo format

Bryan O'Sullivan bos at serpentine.com
Tue Oct 9 15:17:15 CDT 2012

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Adrian Buehlmann <adrian at cadifra.com> wrote:

> It might be interesting to know more about that. Did it fail on hg
> verify? Can you do a "clone --pull" and then do a verify again?

It actually failed during the update phase of "clone --pull".

> I still can't figure out what could be wrong. Which perhaps doesn't mean
> much. There's no proof that my fncache2 code is bug free.

Yeah, I face a similar bug with the fncache C code.

> I'd recommend you clone your repo again with V3.

I'll try. It takes hours to run a clone --pull, though ;-(

> Reviewing this is a lot simpler
than hashmangle C function (where I stall each time I try to swallow it
> and no one else has tried to have a look at so far).

I'm working on the reviewability of that function. Should have something to
show tomorrow.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20121009/03c0119b/attachment.html>

More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list