This cycle's commit-on-default-during-code-freeze award goes to...

[Matt Mackall]

On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 01:42 +0200, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
> On 2012-10-24 00:58, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > I think it makes sense too, but given Matt's role, it seems to me his
> > expressed preference carries some extra weight, and it costs the rest of
> > us relatively little to follow.
> 
> I've now added to the wiki that merging stable into default is unwanted:
> 
> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/TimeBasedReleasePlan?action=diff&rev2=18&rev1=17
> 
> Apparently, it wasn't that clear yet.

Thanks. I guess I can see how people might not think 'no commits on
default' was inclusive of merges.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.