[PATCH] clone: update to @ bookmark if it exists
David M. Carr
david at carrclan.us
Fri Oct 26 13:01:02 CDT 2012
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Adrian Buehlmann <adrian at cadifra.com> wrote:
> On 2012-10-26 15:10, Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
>> The message that gets printed looks like:
>> $ hg clone . cloned-bookmarks
>> updating to branch default
>> 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>> active bookmark: @
>
> When I read your code changes, I asked myself why shouldn't this be
>
> $ hg clone . cloned-bookmarks
> updating to bookmark @
> 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
>
> because you are updating to a bookmark in that case, not to a branch.
>
> The branch seems of rather subordinated importance to me in that case.
Makes sense to me.
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
--
David M. Carr
david at carrclan.us
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list