Wikipage Changeset proposed for deletion

[Adrian Buehlmann]

(I unintentionally dropped the list-cc. Sending this to the list as well)

On 2012-10-29 00:43, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 00:12 +0100, Adrian Buehlmann wrote:
>> On 2012-10-26 02:16, Matt Mackall wrote:
>>> So... link it to the glossary. And if you find the glossary definition
>>> insufficient... expand it!
>>>
>>> Right now, the existence of a bunch of ancient terminology pages is
>>> shadowing the canonical glossary and keeping people from finding it. 
>>
>> Do we have to delete
>>
>>   http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Repository
>>
>> as well?
> 
> You're just proving to me that I'm wasting my time trying to talk to
> you.

This message of yours was indeed a waste of time. A simple yes or no
would have done it.

I have asked in good faith and what I get from you is: nothing.

The problem I have is that "repository" is in the glossary as well, but
there is way more stuff than what (IMHO) fits into a glossary is
currently on

  http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Repository