[PATCH] unionrepo: read-only operations on a union of two localrepos

[Pierre-Yves David]

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 01:20:00PM +0200, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> On 04/15/2013 11:24 AM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:04:25AM +0200, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> >>On 04/15/2013 02:28 AM, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >>>I suspect this needs patching up to be fully correct with obsolete
> >>>markers. So we'll consider this experimental for now. Will eventually
> >>>need docs.
> >>Yes, I guess so. The missing support for obsolete and the missing
> >>public documentation are both inherited from bundlerepo, and both
> >>kinds of repo bastards will thus share the same destiny.
> >except that bundle does not hold any obsolescences marker or phase information.
> >making it merge easier to merge those no data with the base repo.
> 
> Are you saying that bundlerepo already is handling it correctly, or
> that it would be easier to fix bundlerepo than to fix unionrepo?

Bundle repo does nothing special yet (and therefor probably behave badly in some situation)

But bundle repo are much easier to fix.

-- 
Pierre-Yves David

http://www.logilab.fr/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20130415/629a9d16/attachment.pgp>