[PATCH 00 of 16] Pull/push extraction Do not be scared and read me

[Pierre-Yves David]

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:13:10PM -0500, Kevin Bullock wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2013, at 12:06 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:54:36PM -0400, Augie Fackler wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:58:35PM +0200, pierre-yves.david at logilab.fr wrote:
> >>> This series extra pull and push into small one shot object.
> >> 
> >> This is a long enough series and an invasive enough set of changes I'm
> >> wary of touching it this close to the freeze. Let's revisit this early
> >> in the 2.7 cycle, and maybe have fewer demeter violations in the
> >> process.
> > 
> > this series is really mostly code movement. but I can understand this looks scary.
> > 
> > Do you think we should the smaller alternative (linked in 0) in order to still
> > have wrapable obsolescence exchange in 2.6?
> 
> Patchbomb it, please. We can always circle back to a full refactoring after 2.6.

Done, the drzwback of the shorter series it that you have far less data
available on the ongoing pull. this is what motivated me to start the full
refactoring.


-- 
Pierre-Yves David

http://www.logilab.fr/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20130418/e4bfa868/attachment.pgp>