Sketch the header for level 1

Iulian Stana julian.stana at gmail.com
Fri Aug 2 09:31:38 CDT 2013


Specifically, what do you mean?

Do you want to say that those functions must have some different signatures?
Probably in stand of that argument list, some concrete fields will fit
better...

About the return values, like Giovanni point... I can not assume that will
be
no changes in the future. The only thing that I can do, is using a template
and to parse data that fit this template.
(parsing where it's possible)


For the rest of commands where I will not be able to parse data, the only
choice is to return it unparsed.


2013/8/2 Idan Kamara <idankk86 at gmail.com>

> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Iulian Stana <julian.stana at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>  Even if level 0 is not validated yet, I am exploring what level 1 might
>> look like. Here are some sketches:
>>
>> Start with some basic commands that everybody will use.
>> (add, commit, push, pull, log, import/export, merge, verify)
>>
>
> What added value do these functions have over calling rawcommand? The
> signature isn't command specific, and the return value is unparsed.
>



-- 
Iulian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20130802/2a6f39ef/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list