[PATCH 2 of 4] schemas: add wireproto implementations of schema passing

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Wed Aug 7 16:25:00 CDT 2013


On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 16:49 +0000, Durham Goode wrote:
> On 8/7/13 6:24 AM, "Augie Fackler" <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:28:27PM -0700, Durham Goode wrote:
> >> # HG changeset patch
> >> # User Durham Goode <durham at fb.com>
> >> # Date 1375827497 25200
> >> #      Tue Aug 06 15:18:17 2013 -0700
> >> # Node ID ef29e2e8de0198d5041f60e9cbfc7b5a29fea93d
> >> # Parent  f6fca02b697a67bec6e6ca2c9a48d7c7d7f1d077
> >> schemas: add wireproto implementations of schema passing
> >
> >Why this instead of some pushkey love? This feels like a very good fit
> >for pushkey and a 3rd-party extension as a way to test the idea.
> 
> I didn't use pushkey because you never actually push schemas back to the
> server.  But now that I look at the pushkey code more closely I see
> there's precedence for that already (listing namespaces).  I'll switch to
> that.

+1.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.




More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list