[PATCH 4 of 6] plan9: prevent potential wait()

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Thu Aug 15 16:59:08 CDT 2013


On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:20 -0500, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> A small number, less than 130 forked children, may be
> beneficial on Plan 9 (see following test script).

These are concurrent children, yes? The worker code should start up
children proportional to CPUs. How many CPUs do you have?

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.




More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list