[PATCH 4 of 6] plan9: prevent potential wait()

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Thu Aug 15 16:59:08 CDT 2013

On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:20 -0500, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> A small number, less than 130 forked children, may be
> beneficial on Plan 9 (see following test script).

These are concurrent children, yes? The worker code should start up
children proportional to CPUs. How many CPUs do you have?

Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list