[PATCH 4 of 6] plan9: prevent potential wait()

erik quanstrom quanstro at quanstro.net
Thu Aug 15 18:18:23 CDT 2013


On Thu Aug 15 18:06:04 EDT 2013, mpm at selenic.com wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:20 -0500, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> > A small number, less than 130 forked children, may be
> > beneficial on Plan 9 (see following test script).
> 
> These are concurrent children, yes? The worker code should start up
> children proportional to CPUs. How many CPUs do you have?

countcpus() will return 1.  os.name is 'posix'.

- erik


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list