Things we ought to do to improve our packaging
mpm at selenic.com
Tue Aug 20 16:19:34 CDT 2013
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 23:17 +0400, Nikolaj Sjujskij wrote:
> Den 2013-08-19 02:29:49 skrev Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com>:
> > On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 16:44 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
> >>> I don't know, but I suspect there is. How does one grab the equivalent
> >>> of a nightly on Gentoo? How long do I have to wait to install 2.7 if
> >> the
> >> > packager is on vacation? Is there stuff that requires manual
> >> > intervention from release to release like adding new files?
> >> As Nikolaj mentioned, you can trivially build packages from your
> >> public repo's tip. There are two packagers, so you might have to wait
> >> a little bit, but it's only a filename move away (in an overlay) if
> >> you want it badly (e.g. no actual building). No intervention is
> >> generally required for version bumps.
> > Ok, so it's fairly painless. Let's flip the question around: is there
> > any reason we should NOT be doing automated nightly Gentoo builds to
> > spot problems, given how easy it is?
> What for?
Because automatic builds are a bog-standard quality assurance mechanism
that I shouldn't even have to explain. Yes, Gentoo is very shiny and
apparently makes this especially easy... so why oh why are you
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial-devel