[PATCH] push: do not require --force to push bookmarked head (issue2372)
Matt Mackall
mpm at selenic.com
Thu Dec 19 17:18:11 CST 2013
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 10:06 +1100, Stephen Lee wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 18:31 +0530, Prasoon Shukla wrote:
> >> # HG changeset patch
> >> # User Prasoon Shukla <prasoon92.iitr at gmail.com>
> >> # Date 1387389770 -19800
> >> # Wed Dec 18 23:32:50 2013 +0530
> >> # Node ID 241543f591d7f40bb5777ce64174b420ae8e713a
> >> # Parent 5ff0fd02385082433221d0c78a99d310257d27b3
> >> push: do not require --force to push bookmarked head (issue2372)
> >>
> >> When pushing, an error is raised if a new head is created at remote.
> >> This is to avoid ambiguity for developers pulling from the remote. But,
> >> if this head is bookmarked, then pushing shouldn't require --force.
> >> This patch implements this function.
> >
> > You don't mention -B anywhere up here, so I wrote a rant about how this
> > was obviously wrong. Please write a more precise description.
> >
>
> I have already sent a patch for this issue (I didn't realise there was
> an actual bug logged).
> It allows a new head to be pushed if it has a bookmark FOO, and you
> specified -B FOO.
>
> See http://markmail.org/message/osli572jxcdlbsrj
Yep, that does appear to be the same feature.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list