[PATCH RFC] commit: add --reuse-message for keeping the old commit message during amend
durham at fb.com
Tue Feb 12 15:08:32 CST 2013
> What about something generic like --no-editor? It's not as explicit
> but we already have --editor which forces an editor, so this will do
> the opposite.
> It also opens up the possibility of appearing in other commands with
> similar semantics but without being directly related to amend.
I think the name must imply some relationship with another commit, so it's
semi intuitive that it's related to --amend. I think a user would be more
likely to try --no-editor without --amend, and be confused when it failed.
More information about the Mercurial-devel