[PATCH 2 of 2 RFCv2] commands: introduce stash command

Idan Kamara idankk86 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 16 02:43:41 CST 2013

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:45 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Idan Kamara <idankk86 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > commands: introduce stash command
> > >
> >
> > Love the idea, strongly unlove the dependency on mq :-(
> s/dependency on/incompatibility with/?

I guess that's what Bryan meant, and this was also raised in v1 [1].

I agree it's highly inconvenient that we can't support this, and I'd
gladly welcome any suggestions (that maintain the approach of saving
stashes as regular commits as opposed to patch files) to remedy the
situation, or at least make it slightly better.

But considering evolve is shaping up to be a viable alternative to mq
in a few major versions, we would at least have something to give to
these abandoned users.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/p2fkoj5welx6nmkb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20130216/afdbc12e/attachment.html>

More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list