[PATCH 3 of 3] worker: handle worker failures more aggressively

Bryan O'Sullivan bos at serpentine.com
Tue Feb 19 17:10:19 CST 2013


On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Isaac Jurado <diptongo at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh, I didn't catch that.  As of the current code, your other emails and
> the name _posixworker() I assumed, probably wrong, that the Windows
> implementation would have its own idiosyncrasies.
>

Yes, but I'm trying to keep as much of the code portable as reasonable, so
that if someone ports the worker code to Windows, it's minimally invasive.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20130219/17536ed8/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list