[PATCH 3 of 3] worker: handle worker failures more aggressively

Bryan O'Sullivan bos at serpentine.com
Tue Feb 19 17:10:19 CST 2013

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Isaac Jurado <diptongo at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh, I didn't catch that.  As of the current code, your other emails and
> the name _posixworker() I assumed, probably wrong, that the Windows
> implementation would have its own idiosyncrasies.

Yes, but I'm trying to keep as much of the code portable as reasonable, so
that if someone ports the worker code to Windows, it's minimally invasive.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20130219/17536ed8/attachment.html>

More information about the Mercurial-devel mailing list